A Record $325M Sale is on the Table. So Why is the WNBA Pumping the Brakes?
This post may contain affiliate links. Please read the disclosure policy.
A record-setting $325 million offer is on the table to sell the Connecticut Sun to a Boston Celtics-backed ownership group. The deal includes a plan to move the team to Boston, providing a massive stage for growth. For a league focused on expansion, this should be a slam dunk.
Yet, the WNBA is pumping the brakes. A competing $325 million offer from a group led by Marc Lasry—one designed to keep the team in Hartford, Connecticut—has also stalled.
This hesitation seems counterintuitive. While the Sun has been a model of stability, its home in Uncasville, has well-known drawbacks. It lacks a dedicated practice facility, presents travel challenges, and has struggled to attract top-tier free agents. Moving the franchise to Boston under the wing of an NBA partner would seem to solve these problems. So, is the league’s reluctance a strategic misstep?
Hardly. The league’s resistance is not a sign of indecision but may be the clearest signal yet of its newfound strength. We are no longer watching a league in survival mode; we are watching a league in power mode.
⭐ WNBA Expansion: Essential Fan Resources
The league is growing! Here’s how you can rep the newest WNBA teams from day one.
Watch from Home
Watch the WNBA Live on Prime Video
The key is understanding that a relocation and an expansion are two vastly different things. The historical moves of teams like the Orlando Miracle (to Connecticut) or the San Antonio Stars (to Las Vegas) were acts of necessity—saving or revitalizing struggling franchises. But the Sun isn’t struggling. It was the first WNBA franchise to turn a profit and boasts one of the most loyal fanbases in the league.
Forcing such a team to move would be a self-inflicted wound. But the argument goes beyond sentiment; it’s a shrewd business calculation.
When a team relocates, the $325 million sale price is a private transaction. The league and its other owners see none of it. They gain the Boston market, but they lose the Connecticut market. It’s a zero-sum game. When a team expands, as the Golden State Valkyries just did, the new owners pay an expansion fee—reportedly $50 million—directly to the league, which is then shared among the owners. The league grows, every owner profits, and a new market is gained without abandoning an old one. It is a win-win-win.
This financial reality is why a third factor has now become the central point of the negotiations: a separate relocation fee. With another potential ownership group reportedly in the mix—led by Houston Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta, who would move the team to Houston—the WNBA is in a position to charge a multi-million dollar fee to whichever group it approves. This fee, paid directly to the league, effectively turns a relocation into a profitable event, similar to an expansion.
This is the core of the WNBA’s dilemma, which has evolved beyond a simple choice between Uncasville and Boston. It’s now a complex negotiation where the league holds the power to approve the owner and market that provides the best combination of stability, growth potential, and direct financial benefit to the WNBA itself.
The league’s hesitation is not counterproductive to expansion; it is the very definition of protecting its expansion strategy. It’s a signal to all future investors that the league, not individual buyers, controls its own destiny. While frustrating for some in the short term, this strategic discipline is precisely what will ensure the WNBA’s growth is not just rapid, but sustainable for the future.
Helpful Links



New to the WNBA Draft?