W Bound
support w bound

WNBA Draft Battleground: Maggie Doogan vs. Gianna Kneepkens

The Series: WNBA Draft Battleground

Maggie Doogan vs Gianna Kneepkens

In this series, we go toe-to-toe with the toughest evaluations in the 2026 class. In each installment, we take two prospects with similar profiles, pit them against each other, and answer the ultimate question: Who projects as the better pro?

Round 4: Maggie Doogan vs. Gianna Kneepkens

Round 4’s matchup of late first round talents brings a little history:

Last summer, both were finalists for the USA AmeriCup team. Gianna Kneepkens made the roster; Maggie Doogan was one of the final cuts.

Now, they are competing for draft positioning. On paper, they share the same elite DNA: pure shooters chasing the coveted 50/40/90 split.

But one is more proven, having played in the Pac-12, Big 12, and now Big Ten. The other plays in a mid-major conference, the Atlantic 10.

We break down the matchup ⬇️

Prospect Profile: Maggie Doogan

The Case For

Physical Versatility: Doogan looks like the modern prototype. At 6’2″, she possesses the length of a forward but the fluid movement of a guard. She is an elite cutter who understands spacing and uses her height to shoot over smaller defenders.

Elite Efficiency: Despite carrying a massive offensive load for Richmond, Doogan is flirting with a 50/40/90 season (51/43/87). She isn’t just a volume scorer putting up empty stats. Her ability to maintain that efficiency while leading Richmond in scoring, rebounds, assists, and blocks – while also being the primary focus of every defense suggests her shooting stroke is translatable to the next level.

Big Game Resume: After dropping 27 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists against UCLA in last year’s Sweet 16, she continued her stellar play against top competition with big outings against Texas and TCU this season, serving as proof that her skill set works against WNBA-level length and athleticism.

The Case Against

Level of Competition: The “Mid-Major” stigma is real. While her production is undeniable, she faces significantly weaker defenders on a night-to-night basis in the A-10 compared to the Power 4 conferences.

Sample Size: Doogan has only played a handful of games against elite competition. Drafting her is a bet that her standout performances against Power 4 schools were the rule, not the exception. If she struggles to separate against pro-level athletes consistently, it lowers her ceiling.

Fan Hub

This post may contain affiliate links. Please read the disclosure policy.

As one of the top names to watch for in the 2026 WNBA Draft, her journey is happening right now. Track the next generation of talent and see a future pro in the making.

Rep Her College Colors: Before she gets to the WNBA, she’s a star for her university. This is the best place to find all the officially licensed gear for her team.

Get on Board: Get the “Everyone Watches Women’s Basketball” Hoodie. 

Shop Hoodies >
Shop Event Bags >
Shop T-Shirts >

Prospect Profile: Gianna Kneepkens

The Case For

Proof of Concept: Kneepkens offers immediate certainty. Having played in the Pac-12, Big 12, and now Big Ten, she has four years of film scoring on future WNBA defenders. She has proven she can scale her game, seamlessly transitioning from the primary option at Utah to superb role player to stars at UCLA, which is the exact role she will play as a rookie.

Shooting: Kneepkens is one of the premier shooters in the class. With current splits of 53/48/95, she provides elite spacing. She plays with a “throwback” pace, using hesitation dribbles and an unorthodox but deadly shot.

The Case Against

Athletic Ceiling: Kneepkens lacks elite burst and top-end speed. She relies on craftiness and angles rather than blowing by defenders. In the WNBA, where the athleticism jumps a level, there are questions about whether she can create her own shot or if she will be limited strictly to a spot-up role.

Defensive Versatility: While she is a smart team defender, she may struggle to stay in front of WNBA guards. Her lack of lateral quickness could make her a target for opposing offenses.

Maggie Doogan (Richmond) Gianna Kneepkens (UCLA) Advantage
Height 6'2" 6'0" Doogan
Draft Age 22 23 Doogan
Athleticism Good length; fluid mover Smooth pace; average burst Doogan
Shooting Ascending: 41% ➔ 43% (Last 2 Yrs) Proven: 45.4% 3PT (4-year sample) Kneepkens
Defense Disruptive length; Shot blocking Scrappy defender Tie
Decision Making Creative: High usage (4.0 TOs) Disciplined: Steady hand (1.3 TOs) Kneepkens
Upside Starter Role Player Doogan
WNBA Readiness Developmental (Role adjustment) Immediate Kneepkens

The Verdict: Who Projects as the Better Pro?

On paper, this is a deadlock.

Both Doogan and Kneepkens are elite offensive players who rely on IQ and efficiency rather than explosive athleticism. Both will likely face the same questions about their lateral quickness and defensive ceiling at the pro level.

But when the skill sets are this similar, the tiebreaker goes to Measurables.

Maggie Doogan is two inches taller with a quicker release.

Those physical advantages matter. WNBA shooting windows are razor-thin. Doogan’s length and quicker release allows her to shoot over defenders, granting her a greater margin for error than for Kneepkens.

Drafting Kneepkens is the safe play. But if you are betting on who has the better pro career, you bet on the player with the physical upside that cannot be taught.

If you need a player who helps you win tomorrow, you take Kneepkens. If you need a versatile forward who could be a steal in three years, you take Doogan.

Winner: Maggie Doogan

Final Call: Doogan wins this matchup by a hair.

Both are elite shooters with limited athleticism. Who projects as the better pro?
VoteResults

Helpful Links

Stream Big 12, ACC & SEC games on ESPN, ESPN2, ACCN, SECN, ESPN+ & more. Includes Disney+ and Hulu. All for 29.99/mo.

WNBA Draft Battleground: Angela Dugalić vs Janiah Barker vs Justine Pissott

The Series: WNBA Draft Battleground

Angela Dugalić vs Janiah Barker vs Justine Pissott

In this series, we go toe-to-toe with the toughest evaluations in the 2026 class. In this installment, we’re going with a three-headed matchup: three 6-foot-4, versatile prospects who play like guards and are projected in the late first to second round.

Round 7: Angela Dugalić vs Janiah Barker vs Justine Pissott

When drafting in this range, teams aren’t expecting to draft a franchise cornerstone. They are looking for players who can fill a specific need or offer undeniable upside. We pit their different playstyles against each other to answer the question: Which of these players projects as the best pro?

We break down the matchup ⬇️

Prospect Profile: Angela Dugalić
The Case For

Versatile Skillset: Angela Dugalić is a polished, two-way forward who  can operate as a stretch four due to her three-point shooting. Beyond spacing the floor, she has the handle to bring the ball up the court and act as a secondary playmaker.

Defensive Connector: She fills necessary gaps—using her length to guard multiple positions, securing the glass, or providing minutes as a backup center.

The Case Against

The Age Factor: As a sixth-year college player, the biggest question mark is simply how much upside she has left to unlock.

Athletic Limitations: She lacks the elite, explosive athleticism often needed at the next level.

Fan Hub

This post may contain affiliate links. Please read the disclosure policy.

As one of the top names to watch for in the 2026 WNBA Draft, her journey is happening right now on the college court. Track the next generation of talent and see a future pro in the making.

Rep Her College Colors: Before she gets to the WNBA, she’s a star for her university. This is the best place to find all the officially licensed gear for her team.

Get on Board: Get the Nike “Everyone Watches Women’s Sports™ T-Shirt 

See Her Live >

Shop Hats >
Shop Hoodies >

Prospect Profile: Janiah Barker
The Case For

Elite Athleticism: Janiah Barker is one of the most athletically gifted players in this draft class. At 6-foot-4, her pure physical tools give her a sky-high ceiling at the next level.

Dynamic Versatility: She can do a little bit of everything, especially when it comes to dominating the glass. Offensively, she creates constant mismatches because she can put the ball on the floor, post up smaller defenders, and stretch the floor with three-point shooting.

The Case Against

Decision-Making: While her physical talent is undeniable, her overall feel for the game is still a work in progress. She can be overly aggressive at times, leading to rushed reads and sequences where she plays faster than she processes.

Turnover Prone: Her raw potential is sometimes offset by mistakes with the ball. She has a tendency to follow up a spectacular highlight with an unforced turnover, meaning she will need significant polish and coaching to translate her physical gifts into reliable, night-to-night production.

Prospect Profile: Justine Pissott
The Case For

Shooting Specialist: Pissott brings one of the most highly coveted skills to the next level: pure, translatable perimeter shooting. At 6-foot-4, she is a jumbo guard in the mold of Katie Lou Samuelson.

Offensive Spacing: She doesn’t need the ball in her hands to make an impact. She provides immediate value for any team looking to fill a specific roster need with a specialist who can hit open shots.

The Case Against

Limited Versatility: While Dugalić and Barker can shift between multiple roles, Pissott is heavily reliant on her one elite skill. She doesn’t offer the same level of rebounding, defense, or dynamic playmaking as her peers in this matchup.

Defensive Matchups: Finding a clean defensive assignment for her at the pro level could be a challenge. She’ll likely struggle to stay in front of WNBA guards, and she lacks the physicality to consistently battle traditional post players in the paint.

Angela Dugalić Janiah Barker Justine Pissott Advantage
Height 6'4" 6'4" 6'4" Tie
Draft Age 24 22 22 Barker & Pissott
Athleticism Functional Elite; explosive Lacks explosiveness Barker
Shooting Inside-Out Threat 3-Level (Post, Drive, 3PT) Pure Catch-and-Shoot Barker
Defense High IQ; positional Disruptive but developing Vulnerable to mismatches Dugalić
Decision Making Low mistakes (high usage) High turnovers Low mistakes (low usage) Dugalić
WNBA Readiness Pro-ready rotation player Long-term project Pro-ready specialist Dugalić

The Verdict: Who Projects as the Better Pro?

When navigating the later rounds of the WNBA draft, front offices aren’t typically swinging for superstars—they are searching for reliable rotational players. While the baseline expectation is finding a high-floor rookie, a prospect’s ability to stick on a roster is dependent on filling a specific gap for the franchise that drafts them.

If a front office desperately needs perimeter spacing, Justine Pissott is the pick. If a team has a longer development timeline and wants to swing for a sky-high ceiling, Janiah Barker’s elite physical tools make her the obvious choice.

However, because landing a dependable rotation piece is the primary goal, the edge goes to Angela Dugalić by a very slim margin. She lacks Barker’s explosive upside, but her high basketball IQ, positional defense, and inside-out game make her the most likely to fit the exact bill of a WNBA rotation player. Her polished, versatile profile makes her the safest bet to carve out a reliable, long-term pro career.

Winner: Angela Dugalić

Final Call: Dugalić wins the matchup.

We projected Angela Dugalić as the safest pro prospect in this group. Do you agree?
VoteResults

Helpful Links

Stream Big 12, ACC & SEC games on ESPN, ESPN2, ACCN, SECN, ESPN+ & more. Includes Disney+ and Hulu. Starting at 29.99/mo.

March Madness: Stock Up, Stock Down

The WNBA Draft Stock Report: Risers and Fallers

WNBA Draft Stock March Madness

On college basketball’s biggest stage, March is where prospects separate themselves. One signature performance can redefine a career—much like Sarah Ashlee Barker, whose 45-point outburst in a double-overtime tournament loss displayed the toughness and clutch play that propelled her into a first round selection for the Los Angeles Sparks.

As the 2026 tournament begins, we’re looking at who is rising to the moment. For seniors, these games are a final chance to help their draft stock. For underclassmen, it’s about proving they are next in line.

📈 Tournament Risers

Britt Prince | G | Nebraska

Nebraska’s tournament stay was short, but Britt Prince used the national stage to confirm her 50/40/90 regular-season slash line was no fluke. Over two games, she averaged 24.5 points, 3.5 rebounds, and 3.5 assists while shooting 54.5/50/100. More than just a shooter, she hunted her own looks off the bounce and created for teammates with poise. Just a sophomore, Prince is a name to watch.

Ava Heiden | C | Iowa

Iowa’s season ended in a double overtime thriller, but Heiden was a force in the paint. She put up 29 and 26 points in her two tournament appearances, providing steady, efficient scoring that kept the Hawkeyes in it until the final buzzer. Her footwork and touch are reminiscent of fellow Iowa product Monika Czinano, but she operates with a quicker burst to her spots. Even in the loss, Heiden proved she is the next great efficient post for the Hawkeyes.

Joyce Edwards & Ta’Niya Latson | South Carolina

Joyce Edwards has been the engine for South Carolina, averaging 25 points and 9 rebounds through two rounds while shooting 62% from the floor. Meanwhile, as we noted in our Flau’jae vs. Ta’Niya breakdown, the big question for Latson this March was whether she could impact winning beyond scoring. She’s answered by recording 6 and 5 assists while also averaging 4 steals in the two games. Latson is proving she is more than just a bucket-getter.

Fan Hub

This post may contain affiliate links. Please read the disclosure policy.

Shop Sweatshirt >

See Her Live >

Shop Denim Jacket >

📉 Tournament Fallers

Tennessee Women’s Basketball Program

Listing an entire program as a “Faller” is a strong statement, but the current state of Tennessee is impossible to ignore. The team closed the year on a dismal eight-game losing streak, a first in the program’s NCAA era. Compounding the situation is senior Janiah Barker, whose absence in the first-round loss—officially ruled as an illness—leaves a cloud over her draft potential. Missing the biggest game of the year makes a slide in the draft a real possibility. The fallout has continued into the off-season; three days after their first-round loss, Deniya Prawl and Alyssa Latham have both announced their intentions to enter the transfer portal.

Saylor Poffenbarger & Yarden Garzon | G | Maryland

For two seniors with WNBA aspirations, the first-weekend exit was a missed opportunity. Neither Poffenbarger nor Garzon did enough to seize control in their Round of 32 loss to North Carolina, combining to go 0-for-16 from deep. For Poffenbarger, the game reinforced questions about her shooting inconsistencies, while Garzon continued to struggle to find rhythm as a playmaker.

Helpful Links

Stream Big 12, ACC & SEC games on ESPN, ESPN2, ACCN, SECN, ESPN+ & more. Includes Disney+ and Hulu. Starting at 29.99/mo.

WNBA Draft Battleground: Flau'jae Johnson vs. Ta'Niya Latson

The Series: WNBA Draft Battleground

Flau'jae Johnson vs. Ta'Niya Latson

In this series, we go toe-to-toe with the toughest evaluations in the 2026 class. In this installment, we’re evaluating two explosive, undersized scoring guards who have had to transition from being the primary engine to playing a reduced role this season.

Round 6: Flau’jae Johnson vs Ta’Niya Latson

Box scores don’t tell the full story when a player goes from being “the system” to playing within one. For Flau’jae Johnson and Ta’Niya Latson, the challenge is proving their skill sets can translate into winning roles on stacked rosters. We pit them against each other to answer: Which player projects as the better pro?

We break down the matchup ⬇️

Prospect Profile: Flau’jae Johnson

The Case For

Athleticism: Johnson’s explosive physical tools and transition scoring are tailor-made for the WNBA. Her open-floor speed and downhill finishing are highly translatable, suggesting she might actually be a better pro than college player.

The Case Against

Size: At 5-foot-10, she is undersized for a WNBA wing. She will have to rely heavily on her athleticism and motor to avoid being a mismatch against bigger and stronger pro wings.

Engagement Concerns: She has remained efficient on lower usage this season, but there are noticeable stretches where she looks unengaged and out of sync. This raises questions about her ability to stay impactful when operating strictly as a role player at the next level.

Fan Hub

This post may contain affiliate links. Please read the disclosure policy.

As one of the top names to watch for in the 2026 WNBA Draft, her journey is happening right now on the college court. Track the next generation of talent and see a future pro in the making.

Rep Her College Colors: Before she gets to the WNBA, she’s a star for her university. This is the best place to find all the officially licensed gear for her team.

Get on Board: Get the “Everyone Watches Women’s Basketball” Hoodie. 

Shop Hoodies >

See Her Live >

Shop T-Shirts >

Prospect Profile: Ta’Niya Latson

The Case For

Elite Creation: Latson possesses an elite first step and the ability to break down defenses and finish in traffic. She maintains an undeniable alpha scoring mentality, constantly putting pressure on defenses.

Drawing Fouls: She is a master at drawing contact. Her aggressive, downhill style forces defenders into mistakes, allowing her to generate easy points at the free-throw line.

The Case Against

Size and Defense: At 5-foot-8, she will likely be targeted by bigger, more physical WNBA guards, making it difficult to find clean defensive matchups for her on a nightly basis.

Off-Ball Impact: While she has posted better efficiency numbers on lower usage this season, her value remains tied to her scoring. This raises questions about her ability to impact the game when the ball isn’t in her hands.

Flau'jae Johnson Ta'Niya Latson Advantage
Height 5'10" 5'8" Johnson
Draft Age 22 22 Tie
Athleticism Explosive; transition-built Elite burst Tie
Shooting Reliable mid-range & 3pt shot 3-Level creator Latson
Defense Versatile; high motor Inconsistent Johnson
Decision Making High-efficiency; low turnover Evolving facilitator; reduced TOs Tie
WNBA Readiness Two-way wing Explosive scoring spark Johnson

The Verdict: Who Projects as the Better Pro?

Flau’jae Johnson is the more versatile bet for the modern WNBA. While neither guard has prototypical wing size, Johnson’s taller frame, elite transition athleticism, and two-way game ultimately give her the edge over Latson. While Latson is the more natural scorer, Johnson’s defensive motor and ability to impact games without high usage make her the more translatable prospect.

The Edge: Flau’jae Johnson

🏀 Tournament Watch

  • Flau’jae Johnson (#2 LSU vs. #15 Jacksonville): Today at 6:00 PM ET (ESPN). After scoring in single digits in two of her last three games, the focus is on whether Johnson can re-establish her aggressive scoring mentality.

  • Ta’Niya Latson (#1 South Carolina vs. #16 Southern): Tomorrow, 1:00 PM ET (ABC). For Latson, the narrative is about total game impact. Moving away from just “point hunting,” she’ll be judged on her ability to influence winning through playmaking and defensive engagement while operating within a deep rotation.

The Bottom Line: A deep run fueled by aggressive, multi-dimensional play could secure a top lottery spot.

Helpful Links

Stream Big 12, ACC & SEC games on ESPN, ESPN2, ACCN, SECN, ESPN+ & more. Includes Disney+ and Hulu. Starting at 29.99/mo.

Have a tip, comment or question? 📧 hello@w-bound.com

TRENDING NOW

WNBA Ball New to the WNBA Draft?

Start here with our full guide.

Read WNBA Draft 101

See the 2026 Draft Live

Witness the future live. See the 2026 class walk the stage in NYC.

Search Flights on Orbitz

Stay near the Orange Carpet.

Find hotels on Hotels.com

⭐ The Ultimate WBB Pass

Stream Big 12, ACC & SEC games on ESPN, ESPN2, ACCN, SECN, ESPN+ & more. Includes Disney+ and Hulu.

Get It all for $29.99/mo

Discover more from W Bound

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading